Comments on: Devoxx highlights http://blog.jayway.com/2008/12/23/devoxx-highlights/ Sharing Experience Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:23:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: YourGranMo http://blog.jayway.com/2008/12/23/devoxx-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-75441 YourGranMo Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:57:54 +0000 http://blog.jayway.com/?p=699#comment-75441 HAPPY NEW YEAR! Brothers ;)) And good luck to all of you! HAPPY NEW YEAR! Brothers ;) )

And good luck to all of you!

]]> By: Alex Miller http://blog.jayway.com/2008/12/23/devoxx-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-40 Alex Miller Thu, 25 Dec 2008 04:01:27 +0000 http://blog.jayway.com/?p=699#comment-40 Actually, Moore's law is defined in terms of transistors and continues to hold strong -> CPU speeds are now pretty flat and likely to remain so, but the extra transistors are going to more cores instead. Also, the current proposal is that fork/join would be in Java 7 but the ParallelArray portion would be external to the JDK. Nice writeup! Actually, Moore’s law is defined in terms of transistors and continues to hold strong -> CPU speeds are now pretty flat and likely to remain so, but the extra transistors are going to more cores instead.

Also, the current proposal is that fork/join would be in Java 7 but the ParallelArray portion would be external to the JDK.

Nice writeup!

]]> By: system 100% cpu usage | Digg hot tags http://blog.jayway.com/2008/12/23/devoxx-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-35 system 100% cpu usage | Digg hot tags Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:03:53 +0000 http://blog.jayway.com/?p=699#comment-35 [...] Vote Devoxx highlights [...] [...] Vote Devoxx highlights [...]

]]>