<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EasyMock: Capturing arguments from multiple calls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jayway.com/2009/03/25/easymock-capturing-arguments-from-multiple-calls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/03/25/easymock-capturing-arguments-from-multiple-calls/</link>
	<description>Sharing Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krizsan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/03/25/easymock-capturing-arguments-from-multiple-calls/comment-page-1/#comment-6240</link>
		<dc:creator>Krizsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1339#comment-6240</guid>
		<description>EasyMock 2.5 has added support for capturing multiple values.
See the Capture class and the CaptureType enumeration in the EasyMock 2.5 API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EasyMock 2.5 has added support for capturing multiple values.<br />
See the Capture class and the CaptureType enumeration in the EasyMock 2.5 API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredrik Wendt</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/03/25/easymock-capturing-arguments-from-multiple-calls/comment-page-1/#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrik Wendt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1339#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>Nice and interesting, though I&#039;d prefer to see the explaining comments to be put in the assert* calls instead:
     // For two players 8 cards must have been dealt
    assertEquals(8, player1Cards.size()+player2Cards.size());
vs
    assertEquals(&quot;For two players, 8 cards must have been dealt&quot;, 8, ...);</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and interesting, though I&#8217;d prefer to see the explaining comments to be put in the assert* calls instead:<br />
     // For two players 8 cards must have been dealt<br />
    assertEquals(8, player1Cards.size()+player2Cards.size());<br />
vs<br />
    assertEquals(&#8220;For two players, 8 cards must have been dealt&#8221;, 8, &#8230;);</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sune Simonsen</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/03/25/easymock-capturing-arguments-from-multiple-calls/comment-page-1/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Sune Simonsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1339#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>Very nice! I&#039;m looking forward to reading this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice! I&#8217;m looking forward to reading this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
