<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transparent bind of JavaFX and POJOs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/</link>
	<description>Sharing Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/comment-page-1/#comment-78192</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1517#comment-78192</guid>
		<description>Another question, if my pojo contains another pojo as attribute the tool generates adapter class for attribute pojo but the field in the main fx pojo class is the originial pojo.
Looks like tool does handle if the pojo has tree of pojos.
Please suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another question, if my pojo contains another pojo as attribute the tool generates adapter class for attribute pojo but the field in the main fx pojo class is the originial pojo.<br />
Looks like tool does handle if the pojo has tree of pojos.<br />
Please suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/comment-page-1/#comment-78191</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1517#comment-78191</guid>
		<description>Magnus, Nice solution. I used javafxbinder in our project but i&#039;m getting null pointer exception when loading the page that contains fxpojo with Boolean attribute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magnus, Nice solution. I used javafxbinder in our project but i&#8217;m getting null pointer exception when loading the page that contains fxpojo with Boolean attribute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarik</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/comment-page-1/#comment-42868</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1517#comment-42868</guid>
		<description>This is a clever solution. Others used attributes to get things done.
Unfortunately, instead of concentrating on the job at hand, we have to surf the net to find solutions for problems that should not exist in the first place. Although I do not specially like Microsoft, they do come up with consistant solutions that serve their developers right out of the box without any need for third parties. I hope Sun will wake up and add native property support in the Java language and make data binding trivial using a statements such as:
someTable.DataSource = someArrayList;
We could have properties with attributes such as:
@Bindable(UpdateStrategy.ReadWrite) Integer someProperty;
Behind the scenes all the plumbing should be done by the framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a clever solution. Others used attributes to get things done.<br />
Unfortunately, instead of concentrating on the job at hand, we have to surf the net to find solutions for problems that should not exist in the first place. Although I do not specially like Microsoft, they do come up with consistant solutions that serve their developers right out of the box without any need for third parties. I hope Sun will wake up and add native property support in the Java language and make data binding trivial using a statements such as:<br />
someTable.DataSource = someArrayList;<br />
We could have properties with attributes such as:<br />
@Bindable(UpdateStrategy.ReadWrite) Integer someProperty;<br />
Behind the scenes all the plumbing should be done by the framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: st.mind@ : Eclipse Land &#187; favorite &#187; favorite programming site</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/comment-page-1/#comment-12507</link>
		<dc:creator>st.mind@ : Eclipse Land &#187; favorite &#187; favorite programming site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1517#comment-12507</guid>
		<description>[...] http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Java desktop links of the week, May 18 &#124; Jonathan Giles</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/comment-page-1/#comment-4836</link>
		<dc:creator>Java desktop links of the week, May 18 &#124; Jonathan Giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1517#comment-4836</guid>
		<description>[...] Robertsson posts about transparent binding between JavaFX and POJOs using aspect-oriented programming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robertsson posts about transparent binding between JavaFX and POJOs using aspect-oriented programming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Robertsson presents another *aspect* on JavaFX MOJO binding ;-) - Use JavaFX</title>
		<link>http://blog.jayway.com/2009/05/12/transparent-bind-of-javafx-and-pojos/comment-page-1/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Robertsson presents another *aspect* on JavaFX MOJO binding ;-) - Use JavaFX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jayway.com/?p=1517#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>[...] can&#8217;t bind to plain old Java objects (POJOs) yet.  Some workarounds have been suggested, one of them articulated by Magnus Robertsson of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t bind to plain old Java objects (POJOs) yet.  Some workarounds have been suggested, one of them articulated by Magnus Robertsson of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

